Is your Church playing Broken Telephones?

Our Easter weekend was one for the books at Southlands Brea. From our Good Friday gathering through to our three Sunday services, I am grateful and amazed at the life that was found at the foot of Christ's blood stained cross and His empty tomb. The baptisms, the salvations, the army of joyful volunteers hosting the great throng of guests and the faithful so warmly. Thank you, sincerely, to all who served and all who attended. 

One conversation I had with a newly married couple from our church has lodged in my heart though. It is why I am writing this piece in reflection. They recently relocated to another city and church about an hour away because of work.  I was saddened to hear of this, but recommended a church I know  in the area they were moving to. They came back to worship with us on Good Friday, which was a joy, and the husband said to me, "We have had some concerns about the church you recommended to us." I probed further. He replied something to the effect of, "I think they are editing the gospel for the sake of reaching their culture." I asked for an example. He replied, "For instance, they have changed the lyrics of the song "'Christ Alone,' from "And on that cross as Jesus died, the wrath of God was satisfied,"  to "And on that cross as Jesus died, the love of God was magnified."" This lyric change was emblematic of larger concerns they had with lack of Biblical integrity in the church. 

Although disappointed to hear of this,  I actually felt really proud of this couple for their discernment. They were looking beyond the vibe, the excellence and the popularity (this church has all of these) to the substance. Let's be honest, this is rare.

In my Easter message, I preached from Paul's entreaty to the Corinthians to keep the gospel as 'the most important thing.' 

"When I came to you I preached the gospel to you  as the most important thing. For I passed on to you what I received," that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried and was raised ion the third day, according to the scriptures." (1 Corinthians 15:3-4) 

Paul then goes on to say that he has heard that some of them have stopped believing that Christ was bodily raised from the dead. He is horrified that they have changed the message that he had passed on to them. without the resurrection, the gospel bears little resemblance to the original message, Paul contends. He is emphatic that if there is no empty tomb at the center of the Corinthian's,  their gospel is empty. "If Christ has not been raised, we are false teachers, your faith is futile, you are still in your sins, and in fact, you are to be more pitied than anyone!"(v 17-19) Understandably strong words by Paul.

Andrew Wilson, in his commentary on this chapter, sums up Paul's warning as follows: "Christianity is nothing without the risen Christ. If the corpse of Jesus had been found in the Middle East, it would not just mean that the walls of Christianity needed repainting , it would mean that the whole house had come crashing down. If Jesus is still dead, then sins have not been forgiven. If Jesus is still dead then we are all lost, hopeless liars. If Jesus is still dead then we are not just mistaken, we are to be most pitied. Christianity cannot survive a dead Savior.'

It's as if the Corinthians had been playing a game of broken telephones, in which one person whispers a message to the next and each time the message is passed on, it changes, leaving the final message with no resemblance to the original. Paul will not tolerate the 'lost in translation' message, and clearly restores the miscommunication back to the original integrity of the message with this emphatic affirmation:"But as it is,  Christ has indeed, been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who have fallen asleep." (v 20) Jesus' resurrection guarantees our resurrection, and that changes everything! This is at the heart of the gospel message.

Why were the Corinthians changing the original message? In short, their culture was generally gnostic. They had allow view of the metal world and a high view off the spiritual world. This meant that they believed in the immortality of the soul but not the body. That sounded implausible Perhaps, too Jewish. They edited their message to suit their culture. And we are prone to do the same. Which is why a church would feel tempted to play broken telephones with a concept like wrath. It is not the material world we struggle with like the Greeks, it is the idea of a God who punishes sin that were struggle with. It seems so judgmental and unkind. And yet, if we look at the cross, we must admit that Jesus the Lamb of God, was experiencing God's wrath on our behalf. he was taking our punishment as a substitute, absorbing God's righteous anger against our sin,  to give us peace. "We considered him stricken and afflicted by God, yet it was the Lord's will to cause him to suffer. The punishment that brought us peace was upon Him, and by his stripes we have been healed."( Isaiah 53) This is not being pedantic. If you remove substitutionary atonement from the gospel, you have lost the gospel. 

I want to ask you whether your church has been playing broken telephones, editing out the hard parts of the gospel for the sake of so-called cultural relevance? Cultural relevance at the expense of Biblical faithfulness, is a fool's errand. 

Instead, I commend two antidotes to Biblical Broken Telephones. 

First, the Creeds. I want to Make Creeds Great Again! This year is the 1700th anniversary of the Nicene Creed. This confession is what the Church has agreed upon throughout the ages, that defines Christian Orthodoxy. Protestants, Catholics, Greek and Russian Orthodox Christians agree upon this confession. Hold your church up against this creed, for a start. If it does not affirm it, it is not a Christian church, period. I have found this to be so helpful,  particularly when contending with progressive Christians who have an issue with our stance on sexuality, gender, the sanctity of marriage or life. The first thing I ask is, "Do you affirm the Nicene Creed before we have a discussion?" Very often I find that they cannot. "They say something like, "I do not see God as father. Or I do not believe that Christ died for sins, or that Jesus is the only God. It is then that I realize, we are not agreeing about the fruit of Christianity because we have different roots. Theirs is a version of Christianity that falls outside the bounds of historic Christian Orthodoxy,  which means they are coming to different conclusions about the fruit of their faith. If they do affirm the Creeds, then I am more than happy to have  discussion about the fruit of our faith. 

Second, I commend to you Tim Keller's concept of Middleware from his book, Center Church: doing balanced gospel ministry. he describes how churches tend to grow. The first is through what he calls 'hardware', which he describes as Biblical faithfulness.Hardware churches are courageous.  The second way is through 'software,' which he describes as 'cultural relevance.' Software churches are creative. But he proposes that the best way for a church to grow, is 'middleware,' which he describes as the point at which Biblical faithfulness is bright to bear on a changing culture in such a way as they can and want to receive it. Middleware avoid playing broken telephones through courageous faithfulness, but they also pass the message on effectively through creativity and winsomeness. Lord, help us as we trust in the power of Your gospel.

From Consumers to Partners: in praise of church membership

After three years pastoring at Southlands Brea, I was asked to take the helm of the team that led this intrepid and depleted church in 2010. We’d navigated an economic recession, fought a lawsuit over the sale of our church building, and led through the purchase, remodeling and move to our new premises in a new county. It was the perfect storm.  To add to the doldrums, the church had planted 12 times in 14 years prior to this. We were the little church that would. We were willing and eager, but closer to breaking point than we were willing to admit. 

I’ve written extensively about how we pushed pause on planting for three years in the hopes of winning home games, not just away games. This was a key move in our long term health and sustainability. It occurred to me yesterday though, after our 15th annual members meeting, that I’ve never written about our decision around that time to institute formal church membership. 

I know, this is a controversial topic. Images of pastors campaigning for popularity, contentious voting and power plays by deacon boards, most likely make you want to scroll on rapidly. But before you do, let me say that our church membership doesn't practice congregational voting, although we do make decisions collaboratively.  We are elder governed rather than congregationally governed. When I talk about church membership, I am really talking about people who have committed to becoming partners in the gospel.  And to be honest, when I look back at 15 years of church membership practice, I think it has saved our church from consumerism,  passivity and perhaps even implosion. Besides prayer,  I would venture to say that church membership is the single most important practice that makes our church vital and viable. It has moved the crowd towards community, expanded the core towards the fringe, and shifted consumers to becoming invested partners. 

So, what are the Biblical reasons for it? 

1. Accountability After Pentecost there were 3000 people saved and added to the church. (Acts 2:41) Added.  The new believers voted with their feet. They said, "You can count me in and you can count on me!" Those that were added were devoted to their church community. (Acts 2:42) That's what members do. They make themselves available and accountable. 

2. Health The apostle Paul's teaching on the Church as the Body of Christ describes a heathy body as one whose members are both connected and active. (1 Corinthians 12: 1-8) While baptism makes us members of the universal Body of Christ, we see in the Bible that individual believers walked that out in local churches under local pastors. A healthy body member, according to Paul then, is both connected and active. 

3. Safety When the apostle Paul's tells the Corinthians to put the immoral brother among them out of the church until such time as he repents, he is implying that he was a part of them. You cannot put someone out unless they were first in. This is not a vindictive act. It is an act of love and protection towards the flock. We have had two do this on a few occasions with abusive people, vindictive people and heretic people, who are doing harm to God's people. It is never a pleasant task. But it is necessary for the safety of the flock. (1 Cor 5:11-13)

4. Sanity If, as the apostle Peter writes, shepherds are to give an account to Jesus, the Chief Shepherd,  for how they cared for the flock, surely they need to know who is in their flock? I can love and feed anyone, but I can only shepherd those who have placed themselves under my care. It is those for whom I will give an account. So, membership is for the safety of the flock and the sanity of the shepherds. (1 Peter 5:1-3)

 How practically do we implement it?

1. Stick 6 (Courtesy of Vintage Church) We encourage visitors to stick around for 6 weeks before they decide to join us or not. During that time they will have 3 opportunities to meet pastors and hear about the church and make a decision: a newcomers lunch, a potential membership class and a one-on-one membership interview with an elder. 

2. 3 practices We call all our members to commit to 3 practices involving their time, talents and treasure. ( not original , I know, but memorable) we ask them to commit to a community group, to tithing, and  to serving in a volunteer team once a month.  We welcome new members in publicly every two months. 

3. Celebration We have an annual membership celebration where we tell stories of God's grace and growth, have a quality meal, give detailed feedback about finances, and talk through new decisions, new leaders, or new vision. We receive feedback from members. Members are first to hear and first to give feedback.

4. Non mandatory We have just under 400 members at Southlands Brea (there are more in our other Southlands churches) and this is about half of our average Sunday adult attendance. (which means, I'd guess,  about 1/3 of everyone who calls Southlands home) So we serve many who are not members. we do not force people to become members. Many of these people do serve and give. But we are working towards it becoming a majority culture.

Finally, membership has been a a culture we've had to contend for, because in Southern California, the largest church groups do not practice it. (Calvary Chapel, Vineyard, Friends, independent mega churches) People are fearful that it will be weaponized to control them, or suspicious that we will be legalistic. Basically, there is a fundamental fear around commitment in our casual Christian culture.  But membership has been worth contending for, because it runs so counter to this culture, moving consumers towards being more committed gospel partners. If you lead a church I would commend it to you as a vital discipleship practice for a more vital church and mission.

Lead with Zeal: recovering an undervalued leadership virtue

 Many years ago I decided I wanted to be more of a thermostat than a thermometer leader. I wanted to set the tone and temperature of the room I was in rather than test it. I haven't done that perfectly, but if I've  done it all well, it's been because this often under-valued virtue we find in the Bible called zeal.   

If I ask you to think of a zealot, who comes to mind?  Perhaps you think of someone with misguided or unbridled passion for a cause. Maybe a placard waving protester or a hell, fire and brimstone preacher shouting at passers' by from a sidewalk?  Perhaps even a worship leader who gets carried away, losing all track of the time and the congregation?  

If we know the Scriptures, we probably think of the warning against zeal from the book of Proverbs. 

         "Zeal is not good without wisdom, and the one who acts hastily sins." (19:2)

The Bible provides living examples of this in Simon Peter, whose misguided zeal led him to cut off Malchus's ear at Jesus' arrest. Another example would be  Saul who described himself as zealously obeying the law and persecuting Christians. Not to mention Simon the Zealot, who was trying to overthrow the Roman government before he began to follow Christ. I think it is because we have read about and experienced unwise zeal that we tend to view zeal as a whole with suspicion. And so we choose wisdom over zeal and knowledge over passion. But what if wisdom without zeal was also not good? What if zeal was, in fact, a Biblical imperative for Christian leaders? 

Many years ago, a leader called Ray Johnston gave me some unforgettable insight on leadership. "There are two kinds of leaders that help God's people move upwards. I understand them in terms of rocket launching. There are those with a guidance system  - that's wisdom -  and those with rocket fuel - that's zeal. The best leader's have both guidance system and rocket fuel. They are rare."  

Is it possible that your guidance system needs some rocket fuel? 

 It's fascinating to me that the once zealous Saul doesn't reject zeal after his conversion. Instead, as an  apostle, he commends it, even more, insists on it for leaders of Jesus' Church.  

"Let the one who contributes, contribute generously; the one who leads, lead with zeal; the one who does acts of mercy, with cheerfulness." (Romans 12:8)

In other words, of all the virtues Paul could have chosen to describe how Christian leaders should lead, he  chose zeal. That is notable. You and I need zeal to lead! And then, in case we were not yet persuaded, he writes a few verses later, now speaking to all who serve in the church, "Never be lacking in zeal, but keep your spiritual fervor as you serve the Lord." (Romans 12:11) So then, zeal is an imperative for all servants of Christ, but particularly for leaders. We also note that zeal is something we can lose as we serve the Lord, but are able to keep. "Keep your spiritual fervor as you serve the Lord."

So, if leading with zeal is an imperative for all leaders, what is it and how do we keep it? 

First, zeal is not merely passion for a cause. I would describe Biblical zeal as spiritual fervor for God, his people and his priorities. God is a zealous God and he wants his people to be zealous for Him and his purposes. Isaiah's prophecy about the Messiah, so often read at Christmas time, gives us a glimpse of God's zeal in sending His Son to save and rule the world. 

"For unto us a child is born, and he shall be called the Prince of Peace, the Mighty God, the wonderful counsellor and the everlasting Father. He shall reign on David's throne, and of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end. The zeal of the Lord will accomplish this." (Isaiah 9:11-13)

God was enthusiastic about sending His Son. Fervent about saving us. Earnest about bringing about his eternal rule through Jesus. There is absolutely nothing half-hearted about God. He accomplishes his purposes with zeal. Too often, especially in the educated West, because we equate zeal with a lack of education or wisdom, we cultivate a kind of curated disinterest, as if being too passionate isa sign of  immaturity.  But this is far from God's character. Think of Zephaniah the prophet's description of God's zeal for his people. 

"The Lord your God is with you, he will take great delight in you, he will quiet you with his live and rejoice over you with shouts of joy!" (Zephaniah 3:16)

So, how do we ensure that we never lack zeal but keep our spiritual fervor as we serve the Lord? 

First, let's beware of zeal comparison. That is a sure way either to depress us or make us proud. Elijah the prophet, after defeating the prophets of Baal, complained, "I have been very zealous for the Lord. I am the only one faithful in all of Israel." (1 Kings 19) God graciously corrected him. You are not the only zealous one, Elijah. There are 7000 who have not bowed the knee to Baal. Elijah was likely looking for certain signs of zeal, but zeal looks different in different people. It's not always calling down fire and slaying false prophets. So let's beware of zeal comparison, especially those of us who are more intense or extroverted. 

Second, let's imitate the zeal of Jesus as our model. In the account of the Jesus cleansing of the temple in John 2, his actions reminded his disciples of  this verse in the Psalms, "Zeal for your house consumes me." (Psalm 69:9) Jesus' zeal was certainly radical. He turned the tables of the money changers. But before turning the tables, he spent the night at Mary and Martha's house, making a whip. His zeal was not an uncontrolled temper tantrum, but rather a deliberate plan for purity.  Jesus' zeal was about God's priority for purity in his house.

Jesus was also zealous for hospitality. His insistence that his father's house would be called a house of prayer for all nations, meant that any mechanism which kept the Gentiles from worshipingYahweh had to be radically death with. We should also be zealous for this kind of hospitality too. Then we see Jesus zealous for healing. He didn't only turn tables. He healed the lame and the sick in the temple.  We should also be zealous for healing. Finally, we see Jesus being zealous for freedom. He would not let people stop the children running through the temple to worship him, shouting 'Hosanna. Blessed is the King!" 

Following in the footsteps in Jesus, leaders are also called to be zealous for purity, hospitality, healing and freedom. Our zeal tends to flow easily towards some of these pursuits, but few off us are fervent about them all. Let's ask for Jesus' zeal for His father's house. Let's not play wisdom off against zeal. Refuse to be too cool to be zealous.Too studious to be zealous. Too mature to be zealous. If you want to lead in God's house, you're going to need  zeal. Let's ask Jesus for God's zeal to consume us again, just as it consumed Him.